The United States has been criticized repeatedly for negligence of North America’s biodiverse regions
The United States has been criticized repeatedly for negligence of North America’s biodiverse regions. The government’s recent pollution control policies causes many controversies especially in regards to the country’s resource usage. More than 25% of the Earth’s natural resources are consumed by Americas yet they only constitute about 5% of the world’s population. More pollution regulatory laws offer an alternative to such massive consumptions and include advantages, ranging from better health security to useful industrial savings. Environment regulations laws such as the Marine Sanctuaries Acts have in the past, helped control factory pollution releases into habitats multiple times. Such regulatory acts not only guarded people from deadly diseases such as lung cancer but also helped prevent declining aquatic organisms from extinction. More than “394 million people inhabit North America”, each unknowingly risking the aftereffects of untreated waste products (Macleans 1). Despite the hazards, American industry sectors have “increased their pollutant transfers 14%” in the past 10 years, which is far slower than the necessary rate (Franz 1). According to Figure 12.1 of the Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Energy Consumptions record, America’s petroleum and fuel usage overshadows any other resources. When fossil fuels are exhausted , the remaining carbon dioxide is discharged into the atmosphere, causing natural disasters and climate change. Therefore, it is crucial to recognize the necessary role such laws have in regulating discharges of pollution onto populated lands. Similarly, another beneficial feature of enacting more regulations is the financial impact on state government economies. By minimizing administrative transaction expenses, companies’ expenses decrease significantly. In fact, most economic firms in states with environmental programs save up to “2,719 more in new capital investment” than states without “centralized regulation” (Kang 4). Through similar policies, companies would be forced to follow stricter regulatory laws, which in turn would cause the development of more ecofriendly technologies and equipment. Rather than creating more economic expansions through inconsiderate disposal practices, America can improve their economy with ecologically friendly machineries, reducing land pollution. These creations will boost the country’s technology sectors while ensuring a protectorate of America’s habitats. Hence, through improved public health, monetary profit and wildlife protection, pollution control policies are more beneficial to the country than damaging to the American economy.